Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Croatia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,101,901 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Croatia within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.627. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.084% in Immigrants from Croatia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 84.0 Immigrants from Croatia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $104,503, a difference of 44.8%), per capita income ($35,720 compared to $50,417, a difference of 41.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $108,304, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 21.0%), householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $63,168, a difference of 22.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $54,343, a difference of 25.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 53.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 52.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (22.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 49.1%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.2%), and births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and family households (59.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 29.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 0.60%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 44.7%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 36.7%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.55%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.56%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 31.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 21.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.5%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and male disability (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.3%).