Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Austria Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,528,179 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Austria within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.189. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Austria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to a decrease of 4.1 Immigrants from Austria.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $52,400, a difference of 6.7%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $68,208, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,215 compared to $113,140, a difference of 0.070%), median family income ($116,942 compared to $116,830, a difference of 0.10%), and per capita income ($52,044 compared to $52,503, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 18.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 16.2%), and receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.25%), single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.72%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 5.8%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.17%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.12, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (47.7% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 48.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 21.6%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (69.9% compared to 70.0%, a difference of 0.18%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 25.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 12.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.6%).