Immigrants from Uganda vs Immigrants from Austria Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,022,230 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Austria within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Immigrants from Austria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 24.8 Immigrants from Austria.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,043 compared to $52,503, a difference of 16.6%), wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and median male earnings ($56,064 compared to $62,164, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $52,400, a difference of 0.050%), median female earnings ($40,739 compared to $42,824, a difference of 5.1%), and median earnings ($48,041 compared to $51,826, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 25.5%), family poverty (9.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 19.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.24%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 21.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.0%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.52%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.89%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.12, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.6%), no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.15%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 0.95%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 38.0%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.4%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.52%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.76%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.5%).