Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Austria Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,202,088 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Austria within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.842. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.269% in Immigrants from Austria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 269.3 Immigrants from Austria.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $68,208, a difference of 19.7%), per capita income ($43,997 compared to $52,503, a difference of 19.3%), and median family income ($98,205 compared to $116,830, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $52,400, a difference of 0.19%), median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $42,824, a difference of 10.0%), and median earnings ($45,682 compared to $51,826, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 32.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 28.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and single female poverty (20.6% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.9%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 28.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.2%), and births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.12, a difference of 3.7%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 17.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 44.8%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 38.7%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 19.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.40%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.63%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.1%).