Immigrants from Belgium vs Immigrants from Austria Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,695,538 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Austria within Immigrant from Belgium communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.297. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belgium within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Immigrants from Austria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belgium corresponds to an increase of 33.4 Immigrants from Austria.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($66,125 compared to $62,164, a difference of 6.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,575 compared to $106,103, a difference of 6.1%), and median family income ($123,831 compared to $116,830, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,703 compared to $68,208, a difference of 2.2%), wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and median female earnings ($44,587 compared to $42,824, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.22%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.7% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 3.8%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.10%), family households (63.0% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 15.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.5%), professional degree (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.4%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 8.5%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.3% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 0.83%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%).