Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Belizean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,703,557 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Belizeans within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Belizeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 21.8 Belizeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 7.6%), householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $51,094, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $54,580, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $37,429, a difference of 1.6%), per capita income ($39,827 compared to $39,097, a difference of 1.9%), and median household income ($78,682 compared to $77,028, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 22.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 20.9%), and receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (20.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.090%), single female poverty (22.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 38.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 30.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 8.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 12.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.28%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.83%), and married-couple households (43.4% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 37.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 51.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.75%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 23.0%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and master's degree (13.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.020%), 2nd grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.3%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.37%), disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.5%).