Native/Alaskan vs Barbadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,812,734 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.581. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Barbadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 3.0 Barbadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 29.6%), per capita income ($33,279 compared to $42,406, a difference of 27.4%), and median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $41,261, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $54,163, a difference of 4.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $52,202, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $90,266, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (19.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 45.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (20.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 37.3%), and married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.91%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 38.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 31.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 17.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.4%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.45 compared to 3.29, a difference of 4.8%), and currently married (42.8% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 148.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 109.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 80.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 21.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 48.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 80.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 47.9%), professional degree (3.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 40.0%), and bachelor's degree (26.3% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (92.2% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.010%), 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.42%), and 8th grade (95.2% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 87.4%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 66.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.94%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.9%).