Czechoslovakian vs Bahamian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bahamian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechoslovakians

Bahamians

Good
Tragic
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bahamian Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,236,881 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.307. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Bahamians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 36.5 Bahamians.
Czechoslovakian Integration in Bahamian Communities

Czechoslovakian vs Bahamian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 39.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $75,395, a difference of 26.1%), and median family income ($103,273 compared to $82,631, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $35,125, a difference of 10.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $45,743, a difference of 12.0%), and median earnings ($46,658 compared to $39,735, a difference of 17.4%).
Czechoslovakian vs Bahamian Income
Income MetricCzechoslovakianBahamian
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,806
Tragic
$36,427
Median Family Income
Average
$103,273
Tragic
$82,631
Median Household Income
Average
$84,965
Tragic
$69,726
Median Earnings
Average
$46,658
Tragic
$39,735
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,382
Tragic
$44,756
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,738
Tragic
$35,125
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,224
Tragic
$45,743
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,070
Tragic
$75,395
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,387
Tragic
$81,369
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,581
Tragic
$51,000
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
20.2%

Czechoslovakian vs Bahamian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 65.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 52.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.2%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and single female poverty (21.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 6.4%).
Czechoslovakian vs Bahamian Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechoslovakianBahamian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
15.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
16.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
20.0%
Tragic
21.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Tragic
23.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.6%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
18.0%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
14.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
15.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
17.0%

Czechoslovakian vs Bahamian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.7%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.3%).
Czechoslovakian vs Bahamian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechoslovakianBahamian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
11.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%

Czechoslovakian vs Bahamian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 21.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.97%).
Czechoslovakian vs Bahamian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechoslovakianBahamian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Tragic
78.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.9%
Tragic
34.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.5%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
82.2%

Czechoslovakian vs Bahamian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 40.3%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 27.3%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.28, a difference of 4.8%).
Czechoslovakian vs Bahamian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechoslovakianBahamian
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
40.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Exceptional
3.28
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Tragic
41.2%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.0%
Tragic
40.8%

Czechoslovakian vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 40.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 28.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 16.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 26.4%).
Czechoslovakian vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechoslovakianBahamian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
16.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
5.1%

Czechoslovakian vs Bahamian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 22.4%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.70%).
Czechoslovakian vs Bahamian Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechoslovakianBahamian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Poor
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
89.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
87.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Tragic
60.3%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
54.5%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Tragic
41.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Tragic
32.5%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Tragic
12.4%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Czechoslovakian vs Bahamian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 24.6%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.36%), female disability (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.7%).
Czechoslovakian vs Bahamian Disability
Disability MetricCzechoslovakianBahamian
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Poor
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Tragic
24.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%