Pima vs Bahamian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bahamian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Bahamians

Poor
Tragic
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bahamian Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,729,756 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Bahamians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 11.3 Bahamians.
Pima Integration in Bahamian Communities

Pima vs Bahamian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $36,427, a difference of 18.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $45,743, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $81,369, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $35,125, a difference of 0.57%), householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $51,000, a difference of 0.91%), and median earnings ($38,285 compared to $39,735, a difference of 3.8%).
Pima vs Bahamian Income
Income MetricPimaBahamian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Tragic
$36,427
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Tragic
$82,631
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Tragic
$69,726
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Tragic
$39,735
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Tragic
$44,756
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Tragic
$35,125
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Tragic
$45,743
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Tragic
$75,395
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Tragic
$81,369
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Tragic
$51,000
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Exceptional
20.2%

Pima vs Bahamian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 72.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 57.1%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 11.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (27.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 19.4%), and single father poverty (14.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 21.7%).
Pima vs Bahamian Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaBahamian
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Tragic
15.4%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Tragic
16.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Tragic
21.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Tragic
16.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
23.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Tragic
14.6%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
18.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
14.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Tragic
15.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
17.0%

Pima vs Bahamian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 128.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 84.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 81.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 17.0%).
Pima vs Bahamian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaBahamian
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
11.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
6.3%

Pima vs Bahamian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 6.2%).
Pima vs Bahamian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaBahamian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Tragic
78.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Tragic
34.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Tragic
82.2%

Pima vs Bahamian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 67.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 26.3%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.32%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 4.1%).
Pima vs Bahamian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaBahamian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Tragic
40.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Exceptional
3.28
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Tragic
41.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Tragic
40.8%

Pima vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 54.9%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 42.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 0.94%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 30.1%).
Pima vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaBahamian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
16.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
5.1%

Pima vs Bahamian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 40.2%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 37.2%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.31%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.45%).
Pima vs Bahamian Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaBahamian
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Poor
95.7%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
89.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
87.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Tragic
60.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Tragic
54.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
41.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Tragic
32.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
12.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Pima vs Bahamian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 58.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 37.3%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.7%).
Pima vs Bahamian Disability
Disability MetricPimaBahamian
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Poor
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
24.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.6%