Czechoslovakian vs Armenian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Armenian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Armenians
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,687
SOCIAL INDEX
54.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
170th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Armenian Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,164,987 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.556. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.795% in Armenians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 794.7 Armenians.
Czechoslovakian vs Armenian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 13.8%), per capita income ($43,806 compared to $48,287, a difference of 10.2%), and median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $42,212, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $61,656, a difference of 1.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $53,179, a difference of 3.8%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $58,134, a difference of 5.0%).
Income Metric | Czechoslovakian | Armenian |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,806 | Exceptional $48,287 |
Median Family Income | Average $103,273 | Exceptional $109,692 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,965 | Exceptional $91,807 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,658 | Exceptional $49,804 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,382 | Exceptional $58,134 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,738 | Exceptional $42,212 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,224 | Exceptional $53,179 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,070 | Exceptional $103,248 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,387 | Exceptional $107,002 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,581 | Good $61,656 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 24.8% |
Czechoslovakian vs Armenian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 30.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 30.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.34%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.71%).
Poverty Metric | Czechoslovakian | Armenian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Good 12.1% |
Families | Exceptional 8.0% | Excellent 8.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Good 13.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 20.0% | Exceptional 18.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.8% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Excellent 15.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 12.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 14.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Excellent 11.1% |
Czechoslovakian vs Armenian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 30.3%), female unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.5%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Czechoslovakian | Armenian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Czechoslovakian vs Armenian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 27.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.81%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czechoslovakian | Armenian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.3% | Fair 64.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.9% | Tragic 32.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.5% | Tragic 72.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Fair 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Fair 82.5% |
Czechoslovakian vs Armenian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 22.2%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.5%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.43%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Czechoslovakian | Armenian |
Family Households | Excellent 64.6% | Average 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.5% | Good 46.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Good 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Average 46.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.3% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.0% | Exceptional 26.2% |
Czechoslovakian vs Armenian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 19.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 9.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Armenian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Excellent 56.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Good 19.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Excellent 6.6% |
Czechoslovakian vs Armenian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 51.6%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.9%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
Education Level Metric | Czechoslovakian | Armenian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 95.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 94.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.1% | Tragic 92.7% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Tragic 91.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Poor 90.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.4% | Good 86.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.8% | Exceptional 68.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Exceptional 63.0% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.0% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Exceptional 42.3% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.5% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Czechoslovakian vs Armenian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 46.7%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 38.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.6%).
Disability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Armenian |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.0% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.0% | Tragic 24.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.6% | Tragic 50.0% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Average 3.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Good 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Tragic 3.4% |