Luxembourger vs Yup'ik Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yup'ik
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Yup'ik

Excellent
Fair
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,388
SOCIAL INDEX
21.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
262nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yup'ik Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,378,380 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.803. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 7.630% in Yup'ik. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 7,630.2 Yup'ik.
Luxembourger Integration in Yup'ik Communities

Luxembourger vs Yup'ik Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $30,518, a difference of 49.6%), median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $39,504, a difference of 42.5%), and median family income ($106,183 compared to $79,290, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $60,727, a difference of 0.40%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $54,732, a difference of 8.6%), and wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 11.2%).
Luxembourger vs Yup'ik Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerYup'ik
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$30,518
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$79,290
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$69,695
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$35,942
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$39,504
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$32,730
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Exceptional
$54,732
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$73,688
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$81,000
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Average
$60,727
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
24.7%

Luxembourger vs Yup'ik Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 257.8%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 245.2%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 159.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 13.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 29.5%), and single female poverty (20.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 30.1%).
Luxembourger vs Yup'ik Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerYup'ik
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
20.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
18.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
21.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
27.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
24.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
27.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
25.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
24.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
25.8%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
26.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
32.5%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
32.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
13.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
14.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
15.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
32.7%

Luxembourger vs Yup'ik Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 283.9%), male unemployment (4.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 262.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 235.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 65.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 82.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 88.4%).
Luxembourger vs Yup'ik Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerYup'ik
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
13.6%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
16.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
10.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
23.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
41.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
17.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
18.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
9.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
9.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
21.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
18.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
11.0%

Luxembourger vs Yup'ik Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 36.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 19.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 70.9%, a difference of 11.4%).
Luxembourger vs Yup'ik Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerYup'ik
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
62.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
73.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Tragic
33.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Tragic
70.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
73.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
76.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
78.6%

Luxembourger vs Yup'ik Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 141.3%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 91.8%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 79.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.5% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 10.0%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and family households (63.3% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 14.4%).
Luxembourger vs Yup'ik Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerYup'ik
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
72.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
37.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
44.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
4.00
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
5.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
10.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
39.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
56.4%

Luxembourger vs Yup'ik Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 756.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 69.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 62.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 40.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 62.2%).
Luxembourger vs Yup'ik Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerYup'ik
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
45.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
58.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
34.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Tragic
14.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
5.7%

Luxembourger vs Yup'ik Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 104.8%), associate's degree (48.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 96.0%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 79.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.040%), 6th grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
Luxembourger vs Yup'ik Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerYup'ik
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
99.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
99.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
99.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
99.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
99.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
91.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
87.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
86.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
80.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
45.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
39.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
25.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
19.4%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
8.5%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.3%

Luxembourger vs Yup'ik Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 243.6%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 80.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 76.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.15%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
Luxembourger vs Yup'ik Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerYup'ik
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
4.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
37.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
61.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.7%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
1.9%