Pima vs Yup'ik Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,525,398 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Yup'ik. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 27.2 Yup'ik.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $60,727, a difference of 20.2%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 16.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $73,688, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($30,644 compared to $30,518, a difference of 0.41%), median family income ($77,431 compared to $79,290, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $54,732, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.8% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 120.3%), receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 72.3%), and single male poverty (20.2% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (20.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.10%), child poverty under the age of 5 (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 149.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.6% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 110.5%), and male unemployment (8.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 98.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and female unemployment (9.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 70.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.1% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 36.6%), single father households (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.9%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.75 compared to 4.00, a difference of 6.7%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 9.6%), and family households (65.9% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 224.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 48.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 39.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 47.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 48.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 72.0%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 21.1%), and bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.64%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and 6th grade (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 326.4%), ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 59.9%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.34%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.0%).