Immigrants from Latvia vs Pueblo Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Latvia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pueblo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Latvia

Pueblo

Excellent
Poor
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,100
SOCIAL INDEX
18.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
270th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pueblo Integration in Immigrants from Latvia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,616,021 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pueblo within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.415% in Pueblo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 415.0 Pueblo.
Immigrants from Latvia Integration in Pueblo Communities

Immigrants from Latvia vs Pueblo Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $32,012, a difference of 59.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,522 compared to $68,910, a difference of 53.1%), and median family income ($114,826 compared to $76,880, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $45,018, a difference of 14.9%), householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $52,930, a difference of 21.5%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 29.3%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Pueblo Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LatviaPueblo
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,914
Tragic
$32,012
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,826
Tragic
$76,880
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,602
Tragic
$64,692
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,555
Tragic
$36,859
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,422
Tragic
$41,314
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,099
Tragic
$32,564
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,737
Tragic
$45,018
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,522
Tragic
$68,910
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,454
Tragic
$75,601
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,298
Tragic
$52,930
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
20.7%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Pueblo Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 146.5%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 115.9%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 92.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 31.9%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 33.9%), and single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 34.5%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Pueblo Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LatviaPueblo
Poverty
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
19.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
17.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
18.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
26.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
22.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
23.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
23.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Tragic
23.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
25.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
28.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
21.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.7%
Tragic
37.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
11.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Tragic
17.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
16.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
19.9%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Pueblo Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 64.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 59.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 58.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.2%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Pueblo Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LatviaPueblo
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
7.2%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
8.5%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Tragic
10.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
8.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.8%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Pueblo Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 72.6%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 7.3%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Pueblo Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LatviaPueblo
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Tragic
59.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
72.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
36.8%
Tragic
34.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Tragic
72.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.9%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
75.5%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Pueblo Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 84.3%), single father households (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 71.0%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.9% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 2.5%), family households (62.0% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 10.2%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Pueblo Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LatviaPueblo
Family Households
Tragic
62.0%
Exceptional
68.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
25.2%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Tragic
40.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Exceptional
3.79
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.4%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Tragic
38.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.1%
Tragic
53.7%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Pueblo Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 56.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 32.4%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.4%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Pueblo Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LatviaPueblo
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.1%
Fair
10.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.1%
Fair
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.2%
Exceptional
57.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
8.6%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Pueblo Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (19.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 85.4%), bachelor's degree (45.1% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 76.8%), and professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.030%), 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.13%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Pueblo Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LatviaPueblo
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Excellent
95.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Tragic
91.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
88.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
86.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.1%
Tragic
82.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.1%
Tragic
57.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.8%
Tragic
51.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.8%
Tragic
34.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
25.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
10.3%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Poor
1.7%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Pueblo Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 63.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 53.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 8.8%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Pueblo Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LatviaPueblo
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
15.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
15.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.6%
Tragic
33.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
55.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
4.6%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Tragic
18.7%
Ambulatory
Good
6.0%
Tragic
7.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.3%