Immigrants from Oceania vs Pueblo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,026,669 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pueblo within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.098% in Pueblo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 97.7 Pueblo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,623 compared to $68,910, a difference of 41.7%), per capita income ($45,220 compared to $32,012, a difference of 41.3%), and median family income ($106,453 compared to $76,880, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $45,018, a difference of 19.2%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $52,930, a difference of 21.7%), and median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $32,564, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 121.4%), family poverty (8.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 94.4%), and receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 74.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 29.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 36.3%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 36.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 63.9%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 59.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 72.6%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 75.5%), single father households (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 34.5%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 5.1%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.4%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 0.12%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.90%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (37.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 46.3%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 42.7%), and associate's degree (45.8% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.63%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 53.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 45.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.6%).