Norwegian vs Maltese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,564,766 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.572. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Maltese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 15.1 Maltese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,866 compared to $110,064, a difference of 13.6%), median household income ($86,084 compared to $97,015, a difference of 12.7%), and median male earnings ($55,965 compared to $62,953, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 0.74%), householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $53,735, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $66,027, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 18.0%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 14.8%), and single female poverty (20.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (13.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.090%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 23.7%), female unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.8%), and unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 19.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.4%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.5% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 0.74%), family households (63.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 41.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 23.0%), no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 20.4%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 24.5%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 0.71%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.77%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.5%).