Houma vs Maltese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Houma
Maltese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Houma
Maltese
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,141
SOCIAL INDEX
88.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
30th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Maltese Integration in Houma Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 25,906,989 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Maltese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 31.1 Maltese.
Houma vs Maltese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $114,754, a difference of 59.2%), median household income ($62,575 compared to $97,015, a difference of 55.0%), and median family income ($76,188 compared to $115,862, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $53,735, a difference of 21.1%), median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $62,953, a difference of 24.5%), and wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 34.5%).
Income Metric | Houma | Maltese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,996 | Exceptional $49,640 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,188 | Exceptional $115,862 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $62,575 | Exceptional $97,015 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,949 | Exceptional $52,526 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,547 | Exceptional $62,953 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $30,343 | Exceptional $43,357 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,356 | Exceptional $53,735 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,044 | Exceptional $110,064 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $72,093 | Exceptional $114,754 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $44,822 | Exceptional $66,027 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 38.7% | Tragic 28.7% |
Houma vs Maltese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 108.3%), family poverty (14.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 105.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 99.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 49.1%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 56.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 56.6%).
Poverty Metric | Houma | Maltese |
Poverty | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Families | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Females | Tragic 20.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 17.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 24.9% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 13.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.5% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 33.8% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.5% | Exceptional 26.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 8.9% |
Houma vs Maltese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 73.3%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 40.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Houma | Maltese |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Tragic 6.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Fair 11.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 11.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.7% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 7.8% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.5% | Poor 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Houma vs Maltese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Houma | Maltese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 59.5% | Poor 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 72.7% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Exceptional 38.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Exceptional 76.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.2% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.9% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.5% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 74.1% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Houma vs Maltese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 67.3%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 52.8%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.70%), family households (65.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Houma | Maltese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.7% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Exceptional 49.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.5% | Exceptional 49.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 46.6% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Houma vs Maltese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 35.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 27.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 25.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Houma | Maltese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.6% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Exceptional 58.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 20.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.9% | Excellent 6.7% |
Houma vs Maltese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 127.2%), master's degree (7.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 118.1%), and doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 114.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Houma | Maltese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.0% | Exceptional 94.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 93.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 91.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 75.0% | Exceptional 88.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 47.6% | Exceptional 69.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 41.2% | Exceptional 63.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 21.4% | Exceptional 41.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 17.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 0.96% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Houma vs Maltese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 76.1%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 71.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 68.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 18.6%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.3%), and disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 22.5%).
Disability Metric | Houma | Maltese |
Disability | Tragic 17.1% | Average 11.7% |
Males | Tragic 17.4% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 16.9% | Average 12.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.3% | Exceptional 21.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.2% | Exceptional 45.8% |
Vision | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 9.3% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Fair 2.5% |