Pima vs Maltese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,608,442 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.691% in Maltese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 690.9 Maltese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $49,640, a difference of 62.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $114,754, a difference of 56.4%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $97,015, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,735, a difference of 4.3%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $43,357, a difference of 22.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $66,027, a difference of 30.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 179.6%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 158.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 132.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.8%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 45.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 61.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 160.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 126.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 106.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 15.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 10.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 103.8%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 85.0%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 59.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.4%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 55.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 18.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 5.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 86.7%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 80.6%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 66.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 78.6%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 65.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.1%), male disability (12.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.8%).