Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from Panama Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,488,442 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama within Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.719. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puget Sound Salish within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Panama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puget Sound Salish corresponds to a decrease of 6.5 Immigrants from Panama.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,543 compared to $51,278, a difference of 8.3%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,934 compared to $56,944, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,376 compared to $39,049, a difference of 0.84%), per capita income ($41,495 compared to $41,853, a difference of 0.86%), and median family income ($97,958 compared to $95,647, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 29.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 22.9%), and family poverty (8.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 15.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.5%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (65.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.27, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 65.9%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 53.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 21.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 48.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 32.9%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 32.2%), and master's degree (11.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 35.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 28.7%), and disability age under 5 (0.97% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.5%).