Hispanic or Latino vs Immigrants from Panama Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,758,008 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama within Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hispanics or Latinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from Panama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hispanics or Latinos corresponds to an increase of 0.3 Immigrants from Panama.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,688 compared to $41,853, a difference of 17.3%), median female earnings ($34,421 compared to $39,049, a difference of 13.5%), and median earnings ($40,288 compared to $45,198, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,279 compared to $51,278, a difference of 2.0%), wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,832 compared to $56,944, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.6%), family poverty (12.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.5%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and single mother poverty (33.3% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.4%), and female unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.4% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.9%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.5%), and births to unmarried women (37.8% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (44.1% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple households (45.4% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 61.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 34.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 6.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 34.6%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 30.5%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.2%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.7% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.48%), female disability (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.5%).