Immigrants from Cuba vs Estonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,067,179 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Estonians within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Estonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Estonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $67,926, a difference of 51.8%), median family income ($78,249 compared to $118,013, a difference of 50.8%), and per capita income ($34,910 compared to $51,875, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $51,523, a difference of 2.3%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 21.1%), and median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $43,106, a difference of 29.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 119.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 85.9%), and married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 79.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.67%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and single female poverty (21.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (8.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 24.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 42.0%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 40.3%), and divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 2.7%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.10, a difference of 5.1%), and married-couple households (44.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 114.9%), no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 74.0%), and master's degree (10.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 73.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 25.9%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.39%), cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.2%).