Pima vs Estonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,839,766 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.316% in Estonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 316.3 Estonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $51,875, a difference of 69.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $114,220, a difference of 55.7%), and median family income ($77,431 compared to $118,013, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,523, a difference of 0.040%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $43,106, a difference of 22.0%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 28.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 173.9%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 144.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (29.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 111.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 10.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 37.0%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 38.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 163.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 129.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 103.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 15.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 100.4%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 76.3%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 3.9%), family households (65.9% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 44.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 4.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 103.2%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 92.0%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 91.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 80.7%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 61.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.2%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.8%).