Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Egyptian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Egyptian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Egyptians

Excellent
Excellent
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,596
SOCIAL INDEX
83.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
61st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Egyptian Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,275,818 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.599. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.528% in Egyptians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 528.2 Egyptians.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Egyptian Communities

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Egyptian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $48,358, a difference of 7.1%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $61,095, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $54,444, a difference of 0.17%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $112,256, a difference of 0.30%), and median household income ($95,319 compared to $95,673, a difference of 0.37%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Egyptian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaEgyptian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,770
Exceptional
$48,358
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,165
Exceptional
$114,119
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,319
Exceptional
$95,673
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,361
Exceptional
$51,701
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,217
Exceptional
$61,095
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,571
Exceptional
$43,305
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,352
Exceptional
$54,444
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,888
Exceptional
$105,282
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,914
Exceptional
$112,256
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,376
Exceptional
$65,441
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Poor
26.6%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Egyptian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 10.5%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.12%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Egyptian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaEgyptian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
18.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
14.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Average
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.0%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Egyptian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.69%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Egyptian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaEgyptian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Excellent
5.3%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Egyptian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.30%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Egyptian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaEgyptian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.6%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
83.5%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Egyptian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.2%), family households with children (26.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.54%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Egyptian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaEgyptian
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Exceptional
65.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.2%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
48.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.4%
Exceptional
28.2%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Egyptian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.94%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.18%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.94%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Egyptian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaEgyptian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
11.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Tragic
88.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Poor
54.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Poor
19.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
6.1%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Egyptian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.4%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.28%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Egyptian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaEgyptian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Average
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Average
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Good
94.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Excellent
93.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
91.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
89.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.6%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Exceptional
63.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.9%
Exceptional
50.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Exceptional
17.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Egyptian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.4%), male disability (10.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Egyptian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaEgyptian
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
21.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%