Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Egyptian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,824,770 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.925. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.022% in Egyptians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to an increase of 1,022.4 Egyptians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,430 compared to $112,256, a difference of 6.5%), median household income ($90,026 compared to $95,673, a difference of 6.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,232 compared to $105,282, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $54,444, a difference of 2.4%), median female earnings ($42,084 compared to $43,305, a difference of 2.9%), and per capita income ($46,531 compared to $48,358, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.6%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.54%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (46.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.9%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.31%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (63.5% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.82%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.1%), professional degree (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.4%).