Ghanaian vs Austrian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,716,013 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Austrians within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Austrians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to a decrease of 1.9 Austrians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 27.2%), per capita income ($42,164 compared to $48,116, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,137 compared to $101,842, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,429 compared to $40,923, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($52,594 compared to $51,898, a difference of 1.3%), and median earnings ($46,440 compared to $49,501, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 39.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 32.1%), and family poverty (10.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 24.0%), male unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 23.2%), and female unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 36.6%), married-couple households (42.2% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 15.0%), and currently married (42.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.98%), family households (63.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.14, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 86.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 9.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 21.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 55.3%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.4%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.98%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 31.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.3%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.8%).