Immigrants from Central America vs Vietnamese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,867,820 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Vietnamese within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.198. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Vietnamese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to an increase of 3.3 Vietnamese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,974 compared to $42,368, a difference of 21.1%), median female earnings ($33,953 compared to $40,377, a difference of 18.9%), and wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $56,143, a difference of 5.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,965 compared to $93,788, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $56,127, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 13.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and single female poverty (24.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.090%), male poverty (13.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 18.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 18.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.0%), births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 24.0%), and single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.1% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 0.24%), average family size (3.49 compared to 3.37, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple households (45.7% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 193.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 118.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 88.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 23.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 52.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 88.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 58.0%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 57.9%), and doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.81%, a difference of 51.1%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.6%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.27%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.1%).