Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Sierra Leonean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,831,524 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Sierra Leoneans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to an increase of 2.5 Sierra Leoneans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $93,435, a difference of 26.4%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 26.2%), and per capita income ($53,806 compared to $43,405, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $57,272, a difference of 0.26%), householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $65,038, a difference of 7.4%), and median female earnings ($46,502 compared to $42,868, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 33.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 33.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 3.8%), single mother poverty (26.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 28.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.9%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 51.7%), births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 39.2%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.30, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 23.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 0.58%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 51.5%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 45.9%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 26.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 22.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.8%).