Lithuanian vs Okinawan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Okinawan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Lithuanians

Okinawans

Excellent
Excellent
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,907
SOCIAL INDEX
86.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
39th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Okinawan Integration in Lithuanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,269,592 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Okinawans within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.043% in Okinawans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 43.0 Okinawans.
Lithuanian Integration in Okinawan Communities

Lithuanian vs Okinawan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($93,852 compared to $106,624, a difference of 13.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,223 compared to $119,349, a difference of 13.4%), and per capita income ($49,448 compared to $55,817, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $54,701, a difference of 2.1%), wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,209 compared to $70,846, a difference of 8.6%).
Lithuanian vs Okinawan Income
Income MetricLithuanianOkinawan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,448
Exceptional
$55,817
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,395
Exceptional
$129,979
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,852
Exceptional
$106,624
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,991
Exceptional
$57,550
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,228
Exceptional
$67,232
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,108
Exceptional
$46,905
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,552
Exceptional
$54,701
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,223
Exceptional
$119,349
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,484
Exceptional
$124,796
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,209
Exceptional
$70,846
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.7%
Tragic
28.1%

Lithuanian vs Okinawan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 18.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.2%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
Lithuanian vs Okinawan Poverty
Poverty MetricLithuanianOkinawan
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.7%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
13.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Exceptional
13.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.2%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.3%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Exceptional
26.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Average
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
8.9%

Lithuanian vs Okinawan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 33.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.88%).
Lithuanian vs Okinawan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLithuanianOkinawan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Fair
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.9%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%

Lithuanian vs Okinawan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 23.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.76%).
Lithuanian vs Okinawan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLithuanianOkinawan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Good
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Tragic
32.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.0%
Tragic
72.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Good
83.0%

Lithuanian vs Okinawan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 13.9%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.10 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (64.0% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Lithuanian vs Okinawan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLithuanianOkinawan
Family Households
Fair
64.0%
Tragic
62.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Poor
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
47.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.0%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Exceptional
26.9%

Lithuanian vs Okinawan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 66.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 6.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 13.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.6%).
Lithuanian vs Okinawan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLithuanianOkinawan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
86.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.2%
Tragic
51.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Tragic
5.5%

Lithuanian vs Okinawan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 45.3%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 36.0%), and no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.9% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.45%).
Lithuanian vs Okinawan Education Level
Education Level MetricLithuanianOkinawan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
91.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.9%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.8%
Exceptional
73.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.9%
Exceptional
69.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Exceptional
57.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.2%
Exceptional
50.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Exceptional
22.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
7.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
3.3%

Lithuanian vs Okinawan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 37.3%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 28.2%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 0.41%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.0%).
Lithuanian vs Okinawan Disability
Disability MetricLithuanianOkinawan
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Exceptional
10.3%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Average
12.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.8%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Exceptional
20.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Exceptional
44.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.3%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%