Pima vs Guyanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,692,976 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Guyanese within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.401% in Guyanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 400.6 Guyanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $40,949, a difference of 33.6%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $80,734, a difference of 27.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $90,966, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $55,210, a difference of 7.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $89,940, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $56,351, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 78.2%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 75.9%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 63.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 10.1%), receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 29.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 107.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 99.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 78.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (16.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 24.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 95.4%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 46.3%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 125.7%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 107.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 92.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 70.8%, a difference of 21.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 47.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 92.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 48.5%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 48.4%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.23%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 65.0%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 62.4%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 7.6%).