Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Yaqui Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,596,145 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Yaqui within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.214. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Yaqui. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.8 Yaqui.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $46,777, a difference of 47.4%), per capita income ($52,660 compared to $36,112, a difference of 45.8%), and median family income ($125,956 compared to $87,289, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $48,300, a difference of 19.7%), wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 22.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $56,417, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 63.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 63.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 7.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 30.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 62.4%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 57.3%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (30.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 32.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 18.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (20.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 88.1%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 86.9%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 78.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 51.9%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 39.8%), and male disability (9.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 8.2%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.7%).