Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Jamaican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,346,077 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.065. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Jamaicans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 11.5 Jamaicans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 16.6%), householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $54,560, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $50,929, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($43,998 compared to $43,343, a difference of 1.5%), per capita income ($39,827 compared to $39,231, a difference of 1.5%), and median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $38,670, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 27.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 25.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (20.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.070%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 39.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 38.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 17.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 17.0%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and currently married (44.3% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.31, a difference of 0.69%), family households (62.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 72.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 34.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 9.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 17.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.8%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.7%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.35%), high school diploma (86.7% compared to 87.2%, a difference of 0.59%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.1%).