Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Jamaican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 356,802,458 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans within Immigrant from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.524. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Jamaicans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 10.9 Jamaicans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 26.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,109 compared to $88,327, a difference of 20.1%), and median household income ($91,541 compared to $76,583, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,558 compared to $38,670, a difference of 4.9%), householder income under 25 years ($55,714 compared to $50,929, a difference of 9.4%), and median earnings ($47,671 compared to $43,343, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 48.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 31.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 9.6%), single mother poverty (27.1% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 27.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 30.9%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 26.7%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.36 compared to 3.31, a difference of 1.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (67.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 108.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 77.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 11.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 30.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 51.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.5%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 18.1%), and bachelor's degree (36.8% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (87.2% compared to 87.2%, a difference of 0.020%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.6% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.6%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 2.9%).