Pima vs Israeli Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,454,124 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.461. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Israelis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 11.6 Israelis.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $52,596, a difference of 71.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $114,186, a difference of 55.6%), and median family income ($77,431 compared to $118,577, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $52,335, a difference of 1.6%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $43,852, a difference of 24.1%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 114.2%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 107.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 93.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 14.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 36.1%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 37.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 148.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 118.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 108.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 72.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 111.8%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 80.1%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.4%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 50.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 31.4%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 0.31%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 87.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 119.9%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 109.5%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 106.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 82.5%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 68.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 65.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.5%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.6%).