Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Korea Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 334,515,366 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Korea within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.634. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.605% in Immigrants from Korea. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 605.1 Immigrants from Korea.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Korea communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($92,098 compared to $102,962, a difference of 11.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,020 compared to $113,401, a difference of 11.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,446 compared to $121,243, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.34%), per capita income ($48,844 compared to $51,671, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $55,716, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Korea communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 22.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 16.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.51%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Korea communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Korea communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Korea communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 18.2%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 14.3%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (64.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Korea communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 10.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.66%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 0.96%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Korea communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.1%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.0%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.31%), high school diploma (90.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Korea communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.6%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 22.5%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 0.38%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.6%).