Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Korea Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 416,323,819 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Korea within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.599. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.093% in Immigrants from Korea. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to an increase of 92.8 Immigrants from Korea.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Korea communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $70,696, a difference of 4.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $121,243, a difference of 4.0%), and per capita income ($49,741 compared to $51,671, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $55,716, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $44,847, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($53,310 compared to $54,530, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Korea communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 14.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.38%), single mother poverty (26.3% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Korea communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Korea communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 0.88%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.42%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Korea communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.020%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Korea communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 13.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.23%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Korea communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.4%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Korea communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.26%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.7%).