Burmese vs Bolivian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bolivian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Bolivians

Exceptional
Excellent
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,880
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
42nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bolivian Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,399,335 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Bolivians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 8.5 Bolivians.
Burmese Integration in Bolivian Communities

Burmese vs Bolivian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $61,066, a difference of 6.8%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $58,506, a difference of 6.8%), and per capita income ($52,005 compared to $49,526, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($103,145 compared to $102,195, a difference of 0.93%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $118,871, a difference of 2.2%), and median family income ($123,369 compared to $119,479, a difference of 3.3%).
Burmese vs Bolivian Income
Income MetricBurmeseBolivian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Exceptional
$49,526
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Exceptional
$119,479
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Exceptional
$102,195
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Exceptional
$61,066
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Exceptional
$43,445
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Exceptional
$58,506
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Exceptional
$109,372
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Exceptional
$118,871
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Exceptional
$74,245
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
26.8%

Burmese vs Bolivian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 8.4%), receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.0%), single mother poverty (26.2% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and single female poverty (18.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.0%).
Burmese vs Bolivian Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseBolivian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Exceptional
17.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Exceptional
13.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
13.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
13.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
13.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Exceptional
17.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Exceptional
25.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
9.3%

Burmese vs Bolivian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.42%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Burmese vs Bolivian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseBolivian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Excellent
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.1%

Burmese vs Bolivian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Burmese vs Bolivian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseBolivian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Exceptional
68.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Exceptional
81.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Fair
36.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
84.9%

Burmese vs Bolivian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.9%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.0%), and births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple households (49.8% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (48.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Burmese vs Bolivian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseBolivian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
66.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
29.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Exceptional
49.2%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Excellent
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
48.1%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Exceptional
28.5%

Burmese vs Bolivian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 0.94%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.34%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.90%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 0.94%).
Burmese vs Bolivian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseBolivian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
91.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
20.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
6.8%

Burmese vs Bolivian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.5%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.4%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.46%).
Burmese vs Bolivian Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseBolivian
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Tragic
96.9%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Tragic
95.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Average
91.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Excellent
86.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Exceptional
68.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
63.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Exceptional
52.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Exceptional
44.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Exceptional
19.3%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%

Burmese vs Bolivian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 8.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 0.42%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Burmese vs Bolivian Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseBolivian
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
8.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Exceptional
45.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%