Immigrants from Korea vs Eastern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,138,099 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Eastern Europeans within Immigrant from Korea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Korea within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Eastern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Korea corresponds to an increase of 13.6 Eastern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,671 compared to $55,780, a difference of 8.0%), wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,716 compared to $54,066, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($70,696 compared to $70,470, a difference of 0.32%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,243 compared to $120,684, a difference of 0.46%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,401 compared to $114,523, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 10.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (9.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.65%), poverty (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and female poverty (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.9%), divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and births to unmarried women (26.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.0% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.16%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple households (49.9% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 21.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 31.2%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 16.4%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (66.5% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 0.090%), college, under 1 year (71.6% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 22.6%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 2.2%).