Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,625,533 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.296. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 1.9 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $46,213, a difference of 38.9%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $105,655, a difference of 30.6%), and median household income ($67,879 compared to $88,388, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 4.7%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $52,440, a difference of 9.9%), and median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $40,353, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (19.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 62.4%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 60.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (20.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 16.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 21.5%), and single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 29.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 63.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 57.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.2%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 37.8%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.7%), family households (66.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.24, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 34.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.85%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 78.1%), master's degree (9.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 68.9%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.010%), and 4th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 51.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 51.2%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.8%), disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.9%).