Native/Alaskan vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,192,822 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.504. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 8.1 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $44,987, a difference of 35.2%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $104,282, a difference of 28.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $102,261, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $51,247, a difference of 7.4%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 11.8%), and median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $39,109, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 80.9%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 70.8%), and receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 64.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 18.2%), single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 24.0%), and single female poverty (28.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 30.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 68.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 64.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 41.8%), single father households (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 38.5%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.9%), family households (66.4% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.9%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.80%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 61.9%), master's degree (9.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 56.0%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 60.9%), vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 13.5%).