Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,994,081 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.008. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 51.9%), median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $41,932, a difference of 24.0%), and per capita income ($33,279 compared to $41,123, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $50,747, a difference of 2.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $85,552, a difference of 7.2%), and median family income ($80,908 compared to $89,249, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (19.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 50.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (20.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 37.7%), and single father poverty (22.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 52.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 51.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.7%), male unemployment (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 44.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 60.0%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 18.4%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.45 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (66.4% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 257.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 199.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 150.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 43.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 98.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 150.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 40.6%), bachelor's degree (26.3% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 32.9%), and professional degree (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (85.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.020%), 11th grade (90.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and ged/equivalency (80.9% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 105.8%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 91.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 54.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.30%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and ambulatory disability (7.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.4%).