Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,989,966 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.748. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 7.7 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $43,464, a difference of 30.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $100,141, a difference of 25.5%), and median household income ($67,879 compared to $85,054, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 0.62%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $52,643, a difference of 10.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $59,848, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (19.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 56.4%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 52.0%), and married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 16.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.6%), and single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 53.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 46.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 33.6%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 28.8%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.47%), family households (66.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.26, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 15.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.030%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 48.3%), master's degree (9.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 47.5%), and bachelor's degree (26.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.060%), 4th grade (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 47.2%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 45.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 42.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.0%), disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.4%).