Native/Alaskan vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,621,199 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 50.9 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $59,383, a difference of 14.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $44,003, a difference of 8.4%), and median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $31,489, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($67,879 compared to $67,965, a difference of 0.13%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $82,064, a difference of 1.4%), and per capita income ($33,279 compared to $32,345, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.7%), receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 22.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 1.0%), single female poverty (28.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and single father poverty (22.4% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 65.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 56.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 13.9%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.19%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.64, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 42.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 16.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.5%), college, 1 year or more (50.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.64%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 52.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 33.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and ambulatory disability (7.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 5.9%).