Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,895,201 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.566. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 12.5 Immigrants from Bangladesh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $41,709, a difference of 25.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,647 compared to $90,448, a difference of 19.6%), and median household income ($67,879 compared to $80,722, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $55,394, a difference of 6.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $54,714, a difference of 14.7%), and median male earnings ($44,775 compared to $51,642, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (19.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 50.6%), single father poverty (22.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 37.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (20.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 30.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 21.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 54.8%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 39.2%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.5% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 0.81%), currently married (42.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.36, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 145.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 110.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 81.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 20.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 46.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 81.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 55.8%), professional degree (3.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 50.4%), and bachelor's degree (26.3% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (85.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.12%), 12th grade, no diploma (87.7% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and 11th grade (90.2% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 127.8%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 73.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.7%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 10.4%).