Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,945,602 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.748. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.047% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 46.6 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $38,065, a difference of 14.4%), median household income ($67,879 compared to $76,784, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,647 compared to $84,914, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $52,085, a difference of 0.010%), median male earnings ($44,775 compared to $47,482, a difference of 6.0%), and median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $36,023, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (19.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 56.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 42.1%), and single father poverty (22.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.18%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 60.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 60.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 20.6%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.88%), family households (66.4% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (42.8% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 12.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.31%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 36.9%), professional degree (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 26.2%), and bachelor's degree (26.3% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 68.8%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 57.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.6%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 10.0%).