Native/Alaskan vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,748,565 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 5.2 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $52,074, a difference of 56.5%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $118,440, a difference of 46.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,647 compared to $107,912, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $53,739, a difference of 12.7%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $43,308, a difference of 28.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Australian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 90.0%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 82.4%), and receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 79.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 22.4%), single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 29.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 35.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 62.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 59.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.3%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 45.5%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 5.6%), family households (66.4% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 13.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.23%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Australian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 99.2%), master's degree (9.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 85.2%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 81.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Australian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 44.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 42.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.5%), and disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 16.2%).