Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Singapore Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,376,583 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.669. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Immigrants from Singapore. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 19.2 Immigrants from Singapore.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $58,353, a difference of 75.3%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $134,818, a difference of 66.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,647 compared to $124,429, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 17.7%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $56,835, a difference of 19.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $72,963, a difference of 40.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 108.1%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 100.9%), and married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 100.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 21.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 33.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 41.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 83.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 75.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 66.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 71.7%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 67.7%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.2%), family households (66.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.16, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 38.1%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 23.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 87.2%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 178.1%), professional degree (3.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 162.0%), and master's degree (9.9% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 135.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 81.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 71.7%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 64.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 16.3%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.8%).