Native/Alaskan vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 458,459,363 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 4.8 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $53,874, a difference of 61.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,647 compared to $119,496, a difference of 58.0%), and median household income ($67,879 compared to $105,262, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 7.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $58,239, a difference of 22.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $70,238, a difference of 34.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (25.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 90.0%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 85.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (20.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 81.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 21.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 28.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 83.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 63.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 70.1%), single father households (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 68.2%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 57.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.24, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 34.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 27.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 120.7%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 119.8%), and master's degree (9.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 105.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.2% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.060%), 7th grade (95.6% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 93.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 72.9%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.7%), disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.9%).