Native/Alaskan vs Taiwanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,535,142 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.850. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 18.5 Taiwanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $46,455, a difference of 39.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,647 compared to $101,492, a difference of 34.2%), and median family income ($80,908 compared to $107,295, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 2.3%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $49,804, a difference of 4.4%), and median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $40,576, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (19.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 80.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (25.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 76.4%), and family poverty (14.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 74.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 19.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 23.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 27.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 89.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 77.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 65.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 48.3%), single father households (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 45.9%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 4.8%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 13.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 68.4%), master's degree (9.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 61.9%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.31%), 10th grade (92.2% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.36%), and 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 55.5%), vision disability (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 54.0%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.2%).