Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,506,908 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.748. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 27.1 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $57,953, a difference of 74.1%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $126,620, a difference of 56.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,647 compared to $115,947, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 14.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $56,660, a difference of 18.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $69,164, a difference of 32.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 88.7%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 88.4%), and married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 86.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 21.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 26.5%), and single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 34.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 70.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 63.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 59.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 62.2%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 61.5%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 57.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 7.1%), family households (66.4% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 41.0%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 31.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 25.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 133.6%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 111.6%), and master's degree (9.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 110.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 67.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 58.4%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.9%), disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.7%).