Native/Alaskan vs Crow Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,584,656 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Crow within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.100% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 100.1 Crow.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Crow communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 28.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $74,257, a difference of 7.5%), and median household income ($67,879 compared to $63,681, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($38,896 compared to $38,707, a difference of 0.49%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $47,012, a difference of 1.5%), and median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $35,266, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (22.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 35.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 30.7%), and receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.9%), single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 192.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 188.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 127.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Crow communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.45 compared to 3.82, a difference of 10.9%), single father households (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Crow communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.2%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.59%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 37.0%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and college, 1 year or more (50.2% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 99.7%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 99.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 99.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Crow communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 56.8%), vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.71%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.79%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.7%).