Native/Alaskan vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,654,360 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.190. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 4.0 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($67,879 compared to $84,729, a difference of 24.8%), householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $64,920, a difference of 24.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $98,778, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $37,497, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $53,078, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 59.3%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 57.8%), and single male poverty (19.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 25.5%), single female poverty (28.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 33.3%), and receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 33.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 44.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 41.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 29.4%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.6%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.45 compared to 3.41, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (66.4% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 30.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (26.3% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 20.2%), associate's degree (34.9% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 17.2%), and master's degree (9.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 59.5%), vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.1%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 7.9%).